ON THE TABLE: Brian Train’s Colonial Twilight

Sunday , 17, September 2017 7 Comments

This was our first game so we were overwhelmed by the number of options at the beginning.

The sixth event to come out was a propaganda card, so those opening turns mostly involved us trading “Op + Special” moves with very little impact on the relative scores. In this phase, we behaved as if resources were effectively infinite. France lucked up by drawing Napalm for the second card; they chose to take the event on that and ended up with the benefit of a powerful capability for the entire game. (Their assaults in mountain regions were tremendously effective because of this. They could clean out guerrillas there with only half the usual number of troops.)

It wasn’t until the nineteenth card of the second round that the next propaganda card emerged. Both of us ran out out of resources during this round, so things picked up due to each of us playing Passes and Events more. The dilemmas of just what to do were as challenging as ever, however. The FLN used a Limited Op March followed by a Rally to move his fighters from Tunisia into Souk Aras. There was a great deal of back and forth there while French troops cleared out an FLN base in Tizi Ouzou. On the other side of the country, the FLN managed to subvert Algerian police units in the city of Oran and then Rally there until they could build a base and take complete control there.

For the final round, things got really crazy. On the second card to come out, the French took the Coup d’Etat event. They rolled a five while the FLN rolled six… which allowed the FLN to take five French troops from the board, placing them in the out of play box. Somehow, the FLN managed to play the Oil & Gas Discoveries events on the very next card. (There had to be some kind of error on France’s player that allowed this. Maybe he didn’t take a Limited Op when he should have…?) Anyway, four more French troops were removed from the board and placed in the out of play box. Incredibly, the French did not have any French troops on the board now!

Things got extremely bloody at this point. Without the threat of a French Troop Lift and Sweep combination, the FLN could expose their guerrillas without having to worry about getting wiped out. The FLN launched multiple attacks in Tlemcen, Constantine, and Philippeville, completely wiping out the police units and bases in those locations. In response, an embittered French player took the Atrocities and Reprisals event, eliminating opposition in Mostaganem and Orleansville. (Note that this also was an error: the FLN would be able to buy that opposition back during the coup round while France would not be able to replace their lost commitment.)

The FLN considered building several bases in order to quickly increase their score, but instead chose to wage more attacks. The very next card to come up after that was the final propaganda card. After the support phase, the FLN had 25 points to France’s 14, or a margin of 5 to a margin of 21.

After this first play through here, we have ended up with a much better feel for how the game works. After watching several expensive moves simply get undone in a straight ahead “tit for tat response”, the moves where that did not turn out to happen really stood out. Good tactics involve making exchanges and trade-offs where you end up coming out ahead, which is difficult to see given the inherent asymmetry of the opposing forces.

While the FLN has a very concrete objective of establishing a large network of bases, France’s commitment level is a much less obvious factor. Wearing it down in the opening round is a good idea because it will tend to be done via “cheap” event actions. It not only lowers France’s score, but also cuts resources down for the second round, which can become a significant issue there.

France can spend a lot of energy cleaning out FLN bases which not only lowers the FLN’s score, but also raises France’s commitment level. But given that both sides ultimately live and die by the support and opposition levels, the support phase of the propaganda rounds are where the real action takes place. The government will want to go into those rounds with government control, police, and troops in as many provinces as possible because they can protect their support in those places while moving neutral and opposed spaces to full support. Likewise, if the FLN can eliminate government control in a space, they can do the same– but in places where their foothold his more limited, they can protect their opposition by eliminating police units there.

This kind of conflict encourages the French to keep french police units scattered across as many provinces as possible while the troops are used to threaten and eliminate key FLN bases. The Algerian forces at France’s disposal are not nearly as reliable. But though they are easily subverted by the FLN, it is trivial for France to bring them back on the board with Train operations in cities and in provinces where they have bases.

This overall dynamic is very different from most other war games. Fire on the Lake of course covered the “unreliable locals” issue by setting them up as a full on faction in their own right. But baking the essentials of that down into the nuances of how the operations and special activities play certainly seems to work just as well.

  • Brian Renninger says:

    Also, just found out. French can shift bases with a “Deploy” which makes sense.


    Overall, it was a blast to play. Lots of excruciating dilemmas.

    • Jeffro says:

      Oh yeah, the other big rules question we had was that we didn’t understand how to handle the OAS pivotal event. Can the FLN use the capability when at zero resources…?

      • Brian Train says:

        Glad you enjoyed the game.
        Some notes:

        I often seed the Prop card into the bottom six of the first deck of 12, so I know there will be at least six turns before worrying about an early Prop.
        This at least lets you get your legs under the table.

        Coup + Oil: Maybe you did do something wrong.
        Recall that playing a Pivotal Event makes or keeps you 1st Eligible, so the Government player would have had first option to use Oil and Gas or not. If he passed or took an Op + SA the FLN could have grabbed it (but not without his realizing what that card could do).

        Unreliable Algerians: Subvert is a cheap and cheerful way of getting them off the board (and note it doesn’t even expose the Subverting Guerrilla), but it you Attack or Ambush those green cubes, they go to Casualties and are lost until the end of the campaign (however, their loss does not affect Commitment and they never go to Out of Play this way).

        Napalm is effective in Assaults, but it still needs 2 cubes (Troops or Police) to find the Guerrillas in Sweeps.
        A killer combo is Napalm and Commandos de Chasse.

        OAS: Read rule 1.8: no one can do anything for which they do not have adequate Resources or Commitment in place beforehand.
        So no, the FLN can’t use the card if he is at zero Resources; meanwhile, Govt could use OAS to reduce the FLN to zero Resources (can reduce enemy to zero but not past that point).
        OAS is a very strong card and is a sharp tool in both sides’ hands.

        Thanks for playing the game,


        • Brian Train says:

          Also, there are only 7 Event cards (of 60) which directly and negatively affect Commitment, including the “discretionary -Commitment” ones like Torture. It’s better to run up the France Track when doing Rallies; to counter this, the Government player will have to do a Train, which is a lower priority activity for him.

          You also put your finger on a very important point: the Support Phase in each Propaganda Round is a crucial time for both sides. Not only can they affect a larger number of spaces, they can do it more extensively (2 shifts instead of 1, so a space can flip from Support to Oppose or vice versa at once). Players need to keep their deployments of Troops and Police in mind for this, as they often seem to get caught flat-footed by the sudden appearance of a Propaganda card.

          • Jeffro says:

            I told Brian before the game… we won’t know what we should have been worrying about until we see what happens in the propaganda round.

            It matters even more here because it seems (right now at least) much harder for someone to run away with the score to win on the second prop card. And you can’t win on the first at all!

          • Brian Train says:

            Sounds like you guys should play some more!

  • Brian Renninger says:

    This would indicate that the OAS card is supposed to be expensive for the FLN. But, there may be some fine point there that I don’t fully appreciate.


  • Leave a Reply to Jeffro Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *