“Ratatouille”: A film that would be bad if anybody but Brad Bird made it

Wednesday , 9, May 2018 8 Comments
https://i1.wp.com/static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ratatouille_poster.jpg?resize=294%2C438

This is a…rather grim poster?

Brad Bird is a genius.

Now I have made it abundantly clear that the greatest living animated director – perhaps director period – is Hayao Miyazaki, but as far as western animation goes there are several directors in competition for the title – John Lasseter, Pete Docter, Andrew Stanton, Lee Unkrich…

In other words, Pixar.

Throw Don Bluth in there too, he’s still alive.

But for my money the real winner here is Brad Bird, the director of two of the great classics of animated cinema. We have “The Iron Giant”, a surprisingly sophisticated story about a boy living with his mother who finds – what else? – a massive iron giant in a junkyard that comes to life and becomes his friend, and, of course, we have “The Incredibles”, one of the most countercultural films of the 21st century and a masterpiece, not to mention the greatest superhero movie of all time.

But Bird actually has a third highly acclaimed movie, in fact I believe up to now their most highly acclaimed movie outside of the Toy Story trilogy by critics: “Ratatouille”, the story of a French rat who dreams to be a chef.

The story behind “Ratatouille” is rather interesting. The idea had been around since 2000, but for one reason or another the Pixar team lost faith in the originator of the concept (Jan Pinkava) and it languished in development hell for five years before they gave the job to Bird, who was still basking in the triumph of “The Incredibles”.

The basics of the concept were used, but Bird tweaked much of the movie and re-wrote the script entirely. So the movie is basically an exercise in “Give Brad Bird these parameters, and see what he can do with them”. “Ratatouille” is the result.

So let’s get back to my title. “Ratatouille” is not a perfect film. It falls into traps many modern movies fall into. The parents are country aw-shucks yokel bumpkins who keep Remy from following his dreams, but Remy knows better: He’s braver and smarter than they are! Never mind the fact that his parents are 100% right about everything and things only work out through the magic of movie contrivance.

Really, to drive his point home, Remy actually makes a point of saying that his family doesn’t do smart people stuff like read! The meaning is clear: Parents=dumb fun killers who only become cool when they give in to Remy. Remy=correct about everything.

Image result for colette linguini ratatouille

True love?

The main character, Linguini, is a spineless wimp who undergoes absolutely no character development, and he falls head over heels for a woman who acts like a total bitch and who has no personality trait besides “Rawr, I’m a badass wymyn!” Their romance is forced and weak. We have no idea why either of them would like the other.

The plot is whitebread generic. The exact same basic story was recycled in “Zootopia”, just off the top of my head: Child of bumpkins goes off into the dangerous world against the advice of their idiot parents, has a hard time of it, but ultimately proves that despite the fact that their parents were actually right about everything they win in the end anyway.

In other words, classic Hollywood blandness.

So why was it good anyway?

All Brad Bird, baby.

I have watched the director’s commentary to “The Incredibles” more than once and one thing you realize is that Brad Bird pays an astonishing amount of attention to detail. “Ratatouille” confirms the point. All of the cooking scenes shown in the film are absolutely spectacular. The chefs act like real chefs, run a kitchen the way a real kitchen is run, and cook real things. Every ingredient used in every dish is an actual ingredient, and all of them are used in the correct order to make the food come out the proper way. The choreography of the scenes is exceptional, and is one of the biggest reasons the movie works so well.

The characters are all charming and likable, even Linguini…Collette not so much, but she gets some killer lines (“Don’t mean to be rude, but, we’re French”). The voice cast, as always, is exceptional.

But most importantly, the film looks and sounds GORGEOUS. I think this is the real reason it still holds up as well as it does. Michael Giacchino once again makes the case that he is the most criminally underrated composer in Hollywood (lots of work, little attention), and his score for “Ratatouille” is one of my all time favorites. It absolutely drips with atmosphere, making you long for a version of Paris that probably never really existed and certainly no longer exists now.

And the visuals! Oh man, the visuals. Just take a look at some of these stills:

Image result for ratatouille movie paris

Image result for ratatouille movie paris

Check out that background, man

Image result for ratatouille movie paris

Tell me you don’t wish you could go to that Paris.

I think, though, that the ending is where Bird’s footprint is most clearly visible…in the best possible way.

Remy the rat the entire movie has dreamed and dreamed of being a chef, and is finally given the chance to impress Anton Ego, the famous food critic. Given his big chance, he serves Ego ratatouille, a “peasant dish”, but of course it blows Ego away. And after this Remy is revealed to Ego as the real chef, and not Linguini.

Ego in response to this writes a review that contains this line:

Not everyone can become a great artist; but a great artist can come from anywhere.

Though the “follow your dreams” theme is kept there is something particularly Brad Bird-ish about that line: Not everyone is going to be great. You might not be special. But that doesn’t mean there isn’t something out there for you – and you shouldn’t give up on that.

In my “Whisper of the Heart” review, I said that there was something particularly Miyazakian about the script, a level of sophistication not normally seen in western animation. Well, there is something particular Brad Bird-ish about the ending of “Ratatouille”, a level of sophistication that most western animation doesn’t even aspire to.

Brad Bird is, in my opinion, the best director working today. “The Incredibles 2” does not look promising, unfortunately (“Moms are the real superheroes?” Reall, Bird? That’s where you’re going with this?), but considering his track record I plan to give it a shot. And if his weaker work is going to be on the level of “Ratatouille”, well, I’ll consider the movie a success.

8 Comments
  • Justin says:

    This is a valuable review. I’m always looking for kids movies that aren’t loaded with vibrancy.

  • Xaver Basora says:

    It’s a fine movie. I really enjoy it. What I found truly touching was an earlier echo by the chef that anyone can be a great cook. The subtext is that greatness is proportional.you might not be a Michelin 4 star but your kids think you’rather greatest

    xavier

  • RandyB says:

    I used a variation on the chef’s line just the other day. “Anyone can, but not everyone can.”

  • They often cast really big name actors in these animated films, and sometimes it proves that being good at acting doesn’t equal being good at voice acting. Not so with Peter O’Toole here. His delivery of Ego’s review is magnificent.

  • Jon Mollison says:

    I’m holding out hope that Incredibles 2 features a character arc for Mom wherein she learns that jet-setting around as the face of superheroism is a great job that still takes second place to being a mother. We’ve come to expect that level of sophistication from Brad Bird, but he does still work in the belly of the beast, so I’m keeping my expectations low.

    • Anthony says:

      My thoughts exactly. It is not necessarily going to be a disaster. The idea isn’t entirely useless. But it doesn’t make me optimistic.

      It gets a chance from me, but only because of Bird.

      • A. Nonymous says:

        The shot at “common core” math from the trailers makes me hopeful that the “career mom” aspect, and other elements of fashionable modernity, are going to take a thrashing.

  • TWS says:

    I have an intense dislike of rats and my younger kids and grandkids loved this movie. I can’t count how many times I’ve sat through this one and had the crawling heebee jeebees through the whole thing.

  • Please give us your valuable comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *