REVIEW: Christian Horror, by Mike Duran

Thursday , 21, May 2015 8 Comments

A survey of horror themes within Christian community, belief and arts.

Much has been written here about the decline since the early 1990s of Science Fiction, and the evaporation of certain subgenres, such as Sword & Sorcery  and Sword & Planet, and the co-option of others by dopplegangers, such as hard science fiction.

However, if the Nielsen bookscan figures are to be believed, the popularity of the Horror novel has suffered a cataclysmic decline more dramatic than any of the above losses.

Horror, which exploded in the late 1970s and 1980s with the mainstream ascendancy of Stephen King, Peter Straub, Dean Koontz, Clive Barker,  and that wonderful chameleon Robert R. McCammon whose work emerged as a long-running subset of science fiction into a full-throated market category of its own. (Although with Shelley’s Frankenstein, one can argue that horror is in fact the bride of science fiction, and not its descendant.)

As late as 2004, the Horror genre was indeed waning from its twenty-year peak in the 80s and 90s, but was still selling better than regular (or general) Science Fiction, Westerns and Action/Adventure novels. But, well before the advent of the functional e-book, Horror began to slip in popularity.Today, it is scarcely more popular than the tiny (but never dead) Western genre, and is less popular than Action/Adventure and is considerably smaller than Science Fiction.


The best screen grab I could get from Johnathan Nowell's original Nielsen presentation.

The best screen grab I could get from Johnathan Nowell’s original Nielsen presentation. Note the decline trend before the e-book was successfully introduced on a large scale.

There are a lot of factors related to the decline of horror: Stephen King passed his peak (in horror, particularly) a long time ago, seemingly voluntarily. From his accounts, he has written pretty much everything he wanted to write in the genre. Sometimes twice!

More than that, perhaps the changing nature of horror movies has impacted the appeal of horror books. Torture-porn may serve as an endurance test for visual fans of Saw and whatever way Rob Zombie murders his wife next, but it doesn’t make for a hot book. American Psycho may have sold millions in the 1990s for Bret Easton Ellis’ examination of gore and greed, but straight up horror novels themselves necessarily depend on at least as much psychological fear as they do on fancy ways to die and hurt. Perhaps there was nowhere left for horror to go.

Or perhaps, as Mike Duran argues (in small part) in Christian Horror: On the Compatibility of Biblical Worldview and the Horror Genre, the Horror genre has been abandoned by Christians and – moreover – shunned by other professing Christians who practice white magic.

Yes, you read that correctly.

Duran’s brief but well-documented treatise explores the modern horror genre through the lens of traditional Christian beliefs, of modern evangelical cultural norms, through the publishing industry, and from a philosophical viewpoint. Ultimately, he argues that the horror genre owes its vitality to religion – generally – and to the Christian faith in particular. He surveys classic films and stories, such as The Wicker Man or H.P. Lovecraft and ties insights about warring views (those of the horror creators and of the characters within horror works) of the cosmos or of faith or of reliance on nature to the visceral effectiveness of the “fear” genre.

By exploring the ghostly, the macabre, and examining their primordial origins – not in Darwinian fantasy, but in biblical history and Christian instruction – Duran goes beyond finding a compatability between the horror genre and the Christian faith, he begins to the scratch the surface of a critical link between the two.

Speaking of ghostly, Duran takes an intriguing excursion into the nature of ghosts as a physical energy construct that fits well within a Christian’s fundamental concept of the world that will appeal to both supernaturalists and astrophysicists alike. If you have enjoyed SciPhi Journal, you will find a lot of food for thought in Christian Horror.

Now, as a big fan of Danse Macabre, I would have loved to see Duran go more deeply into the themes of classic and contemporary horror novels and films, as he always finds a way to dredge up absolutely strange (yet true!) and deep nuggets in his exploration of the genre. However, the book is an efficient vivisection of the state of modern horror, as a publishing, cultural and Christian issue.

The idea that the horror genre is in freefall now due to its general “post-Christian” identity may sound preposterous – to both Christians and unbelievers alike. But Duran makes a powerful case that – despite seeming impossible – it is nothing less than the Gospel truth.

Christian Horror: On the Compatibility of Biblical Worldview, Blue Crescent Press. $2.99 ebook, $6.99 paperback. 113 pages.

  • MattK says:

    I find the premise interesting, and will probably buy and read sometime after I’ve waded through all the Hugo stuff.

    My immediate thought while reading your review is that probably a lot of people are having their “horror itch” scratched in the Urban Fantasy genre, which seems to often incorporate some traditional horror tropes.

  • Daniel says:

    I am in accordance with you…except for the fact that fantasy doesn’t appear to have absorbed the entire loss in horror. But it is definitely a factor.

  • Astrosorceror says:

    John C. Wright also has an excellent article on the subject:

  • The CronoLink says:

    I am intrigued. I’ll see if I can get the book in the next few days. Thanks.

  • GKChesterton says:

    So, can you explain the “white magic” bit?

    • Daniel says:

      Yes. Duran makes the argument that some of the more censorial behavior of – in his example, though it has wider application – of some evangelical Christians is, in fact, a form of white magic – something prohibited in Christian dealings.

      In other words, these are the sort who ascribe supernatural powers to inanimate objects – that a book that contains X, for example, is taboo, and can exert power over the minds and spirits of Christians.

      It is a really interesting argument that Duran makes far better than I might hope to, and he is careful to distinguish between things that – for various reasons – can be bad for an individual vs. objects and artifacts that are – in the view of the white magicians – intrinsically bad.

  • GK Chesterton says:

    Does he happen to be Protestant? It seems a strange argument to make. Things have power unto themselves like a car can move. One imagines that metaphysical power attaches itself in the same way. I’m also confused by it being “white”.

    I’ll add it to my list though. If you reviewed it it must be worth while.

  • Daniel says:

    It is an interesting argument, made from moral and ethical principles in scripture. I’m sure you would find it worthwhile to read it.

  • Please give us your valuable comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *