Retro Fandom Friday – Even the Letter Column in This Issue Was Boring…

Friday , 22, June 2018 4 Comments

There wasn’t anything all that special in Astounding Oct. 1949’s letters section, and since the letters haven’t caught up to where I’ve actually read yet, it’s hard to glean much from them. Typical mixed bag of “It’s great” and “It’s terrible”, though I’ve noticed that Lensman seems to be a really love-it-or-hate-it series, even in its own time. Also, for whatever reason there’s another story hidden behind the letters section which I almost missed. ::Shrug::

Warren Carroll says “With every issue, the 1949 Astounding grows better and better.” Of course, he hasn’t factored in any of the issues I’ve read so far, and I can’t weigh in, as I haven’t read the issues or stories he lauds.

R.J. Raven-Hart has low marks for the November 1948 issue (“Quite the poorest issue I have seen as regards to fiction; [but] far away the best as regards to articles”) and January (“Poor stories compared to your usual standard”) 1949 issue, with mixed for February 1949.

I am a wireless engineer myself, of the old days—I can claim to have seen a coherer, not actually in use, but in reserve to be switched in should the electrolytic detector fail—and was in radar during the war, and I had never realized the progress I had seen. Ley was, as ever, first-class; so was the Locke article. By the way, I note with alarm that recent letters from readers have suggested the discontinuance of articles—I hope this is not your policy. They should continue, if only to give the high-brow an excuse when found to be a reader of Astounding. Oh, and congratulations to van Vogt for doing something I thought quite impossible—writing something duller than the “Lensman” stories.

Insert “I read it for the articles” meme here.

I’ll get to the final story in this issue next week.

In the meantime, please consider checking out Wild Stars: Time Warmageddon:

4 Comments
  • Mark McSherry says:

    You are giving up on Astounding when the VERY NEXT issue is one of its most famous??? That would be the November 1949 “Prophecy” issue.

    Andrew May sums things up nicely—

    http://www.andrew-may.com/asf/prophecy.htm

    • Alex says:

      I’m not giving up yet; I’m giving it one more issue before taking a break and going back to reviewing the pulps for a bit.

  • Mark McSherry says:

    That’s good to hear. A lot of Campbell stalwarts appear in the November 1949 issue.

    Sometime in the future, I’d appreciate your take on L. Ron Hubbard’s two part serial, TO THE STARS, in the Feb-Mar 1950 ASF. I’m quite fond of it though Poul Anderson wasn’t. He even wrote a short series of stories (The Kith), beginning in 1954 with ‘Ghetto’ “… to rebut what I felt was a pretty poor novel by another writer. Both drew on the phenomena of time dilation.”

    The Anderson quote is from his story collection GOING FOR INFINITY in the introduction to the most memorable Kith story,’The Horn of Time the Hunter’.

    • Alex says:

      I’ll check and see if I have those; I mean, I might dig it. Hubbard’s story was the only one in this issue that I really enjoyed.

  • Please give us your valuable comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *