Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in /home/linweb28/c/ on line 31

Deprecated: Methods with the same name as their class will not be constructors in a future version of PHP; wpTBLang has a deprecated constructor in /home/linweb28/c/ on line 3
The Last Jedi Is Star Wars for People Who HATE Star Wars –

The Last Jedi Is Star Wars for People Who HATE Star Wars

Monday , 18, December 2017 40 Comments

If Rogue One was Star Wars for people who didn’t like Star Wars, then The Last Jedi is Star Wars for people who HATE Star Wars. By, for, and of.

“But I like Star Wars!” That’s fine. They still didn’t make this movie for you. This is a movie with contempt for you, the audience, contempt for the characters, and contempt for Star Wars itself.

The movie LOOKS great. Ships go fast, things blow up, people shoot blasters: it looks appropriately Star Warsian. The director has spectacle down pat, maybe even better than JJ Abrams did. But that’s all the movie has going for it: spectacle. That can entertaining by itself, but once you notice the underlying problems (so many I can only touch on a few here), you realize that, despite it looking like Star Wars, it’s just not Star Wars.

Star Wars is supposed to be a Science Fiction Space Opera, an epic story about the struggle between good and evil. Good is noble, honorable, and virtuous. Half of Team Evil, in the form of the Galactic Empire, is clear and unambiguous: it is a cruel and murderous despotism who maintains power through terror and force. The other half of Team Up To No Good—The Force and the Dark Side thereof—is amorphous, seductive, and corrupting. As the Rebels fight the Empire in starships to defeat its evil, so, too, must Luke Skywalker fight against the whispers of the Dark Side in his heart, fight to embrace the harder but more rewarding path of the Light Side, in order to defeat Lord Vader and ultimately the Emperor. That is Star Wars, and a movie without that dichotomy at its core is not Star Warsian.

The Last Jedi evinces no such dichotomy. Though its metaphysics are murky, as is its morality, and though it pays lip service to the notion of the Dark Side, when Rey confronts a place strong in the Dark Side (as Luke did in the tree on Dagobah), the Dark Side appears as just an infinite mirror, reflecting Rey back at herself. It’s a magical trap, straight out of a Sword and Sorcery tale, and unlike the Dark Side tree on Dagobah the infinite mirror pit is neither ominous nor disturbing. The Dark tree revealed to Luke the danger of him becoming his father, in a memorable and jarring vision; the Hall of Infinite Mirrors reveals precisely nothing about Rey. She makes no meaningful choices, gains no insights, and the entire event is pointless. There is nothing at all to indicate why this part of the island is Dark, nor does that imputed quality affect the movie in the slightest.

Moreover, the movie explicitly embraces the notion that the Force itself is Balance (Luke says this over and over again when teaching Rey). Not split between Light and Dark, but Balance. Added to this, the only coherent moral thesis advanced by any character is explicitly nihilistic and relativistic: Benicio Del Toro’s character says there is no difference between the Republic and the First Order, that cruel and wealthy arms merchants arm both sides and profit from the war, no matter who wins. Taken to its logical extent, making war against the First Order is meaningless, as both sides are (in effect) the same and whether one or the other wins, nothing changes.

Star Wars is about heroics and heroism. From the raid on the Death Star to rescue the princess, to the doomed last-ditch battle on Hoth, buying time for the transports to escape, to the intricate plot to rescue Han Solo from Jabba the Hut, characters risk their lives to save the lives of others or just to fight evil, many times at great cost to themselves. Courage, especially physical courage, is central to the entire trilogy (and is the chief reason the series is so beloved).

The Last Jedi mocks courage, heroics, and heroism. Poe Dameron, the cocky fighter pilot, risks his life and the lives of his teammates to destroy the most formidable ship hunting the Resistance, and for this is upbraided and demoted. Later, faced with a no-win scenario, he concocts a desperate plan to disable the First Order’s tracking, allowing the remnants of the Resistance to escape and live to fight another day. Not only does the plan fail, it results in the deaths of some 2/3rds of what few members of the Resistance were left. And when Finn, a non-entity through most of the film, is about to sacrifice his own life to save even that pitiful remnant, he is knocked off course by a fellow rebel, and the First Order’s weapon is allowed to fire. His self-sacrifice, the intervening character says, is stupid and pointless because that’s just the way it is.

The only time anyone is allowed to sacrifice themselves heroically, is when Vice Admiral Tumblr Hair (played by Laura Dern) gets to blow up the entire First Order fleet whilst dying heroically, but even this sacrifice is meaningless: Kylo Ren and General Hux survive, and are able to mount an assault on the planetary base the Rebels fled to, an assault that is more than twice as large as the one Vader launched against Hoth. Tumblr Hair dies for nothing. In this movie, all heroics are meaningless, and that is just not Star Wars.

The total lack of heroism is one reason, but the other is this: This movie is just not epic. And Star Wars is epic.

I don’t mean epic as in a series of ten 300,000 word novels, I mean epic as in a weighty and significant struggle which matters. A struggle that means something. Tolkien, now Tolkien was epic. Even the Jackson “Lord of the Rings” movies managed to feel epic. (“The Hobbit” movies, not so much.)

The original Star Wars trilogy, from the Death Star to… well, the other Death Star was epic. It was a galactic struggle for freedom, with momentous consequences for the galaxy, and the movies let you feel that. Hell, even the PREQUEL TRILOGY was epic (in comparison). Get past the first film, and the struggle against the robot armies and the loss of freedom for the galaxy had moments of epicness. Star Wars is supposed to be epic.

The Last Jedi is not epic.

The very first scene is Poe pranking General Hux (primary combat leader of the First Order), just like Bart Simpson used to prank Moe the Bartender. No, Hux didn’t ask around for an “I. C. Weiner? Is there an I. C. Weiner on the bridge?” but he did say, over and over, “Can he hear me now?” after Poe placed him on hold.

That’s right. The head of the main bad guys—who MUST be competent and terrifying for the film to feel epic—is reduced to a stammering doof parodying a VERIZON WIRELESS AD.

(You know, I didn’t think you could HAVE product placement in a Star Wars film. Well played, Disney. Well played, indeed.)

The inapt and distracting humor (Content Warning: actual humor not included) continued throughout the movie. The film never had the chance to feel epic because every moment of sincerity was spoiled by a joke. It was so bad, I kept expecting Vice Admiral Tumblr Hair to stroll onto the bridge shouting “Wassup bitches!” It would not have been out of place.

“Epic” is a matter of artistic execution, not in-world scale. You can threaten to blow up two ferries with a couple of hundred people aboard or actually blow up five planets with billions of inhabitants, and the first scene might very well feel more epic than the second, if the director makes it so.

Epic and moving stories—epic in spirit, not epic in length, stories of great deeds being done by great men—require a sense of grandeur, of majesty, of awe. That is, the writer must have, within their breast, an understanding of the might and power of great men and great deeds. They must FEEL it.

A small man cannot.

Small men—not short men, but men with shriveled souls—have no notion of greatness nor daring. They cannot comprehend nor depict a struggle against insuperable odds, self-sacrifice in the face of near-certain doom. Their own paucity of courage and manliness dooms their every effort. Art reveals the artist, inevitably.

Even if they depict events that might, in other hands, feel epic, in their hands such events appear quotidian and even boring. Explosions, practical effects, and sound design can give the appearance of an epic struggle, and can distract the audience from a work’s fundamental flaws, but if at its center there is naught but a hollow emptiness, a nihilistic meaningless, this will render all the struggles pointless, no matter how many people are supposedly fighting or supposedly dying.

Epic stories like Star Wars do not have weak and incompetent enemies, nor do they mock heroism and heroes. The Last Jedi never does anything but.

Epic deeds are never pointless. They ALWAYS impact the world. They matter. No deed in TLJ matters. In the end, the good guys are utterly defeated. The Rebellion is destroyed, reduced to the paltry few who can ride aboard the Millennium Falcon, and the entire Galaxy has abandoned them, choosing despotism over the animating struggle for freedom. The movie is a Shoot the Shaggy Dog story, made up of many smaller Shoot the Shaggy Dog stories. It’s a fractal diagram of suck, and the closer you look, the more abhorrent elements you discover. TLJ is suck all the way down.

The Prequels were bad Star Wars movies. The Last Jedi is a bad not-a-StarWars movie. TLJ is the anti-Star Wars, the un-Star Wars, a cheap and hollow counterfeit of a far greater work, identical in appearance, but lacking any substance.

I’ve noticed that the more exposure people have to Pulp stories—you know, the GOOD stuff—the more they tend to dislike The Last Jedi. People who read Pulp regularly have become attuned to the flaws of modern F&SF, so the deficiencies in TLJ are readily apparent to them. To fans of the more modern stuff, this probably seems like more of the same entertainment they get every day. Which is most of the problem, and not just with this movie, but post-modern culture as a whole.

Audiences WANT stories of heroism and heroics. They meet a deep need in us to admire the brave and self-sacrificing, and to be inspired by them.

The Last Jedi is not such a tale. It is entertaining, because of spectacle, but that spectacle hides the movie’s poisonous core of nihilism. Time will not be kind.

After all, a movie that includes this scene will never attain the status of an intergenerationally beloved classic:

That right there is the ultimate moment of contempt for Luke Skywalker, and the ultimate moment of contempt for the audience.

I rest my case.

Jasyn Jones, better known as Daddy Warpig, is a host on the Geek Gab podcast, a regular on the Superversive SF livestreams, and blogs at Daddy Warpig’s House of Geekery. Check him out on Twitter.

  • Kaiju says:

    I’m just here for the inevitable salt party.

  • JD Cowan says:

    Star Wars has been over since ROTJ. Not surprised by anything in this review.

  • Anthony says:

    I will need to disagree about Serenity. Moments that required Serenity were played that way. There is no joke in Shepherd Book’s death, or the revelation of the origin of the Reavers. When Zoe talks to Mal about the sacrifice of the random guy, there is no joke.

    At the climax of Mal’s character arc, before the fight with the Operative, Mal does make a quick joke, but he follows it up by doing what he claimed. When the Operative finds out the truth? No joke. When River saves them? No joke.

    Serenity had jokes, but the narrative was serious and played that way.

    • Jasyn Jones says:

      Trying to draw a parallell. Didn’t work. Removed.

    • Nomad says:

      Serenity portrayed almost all the range of humor and used it appropriately; ranging from the gallows humor when people were gasping to regain a few more breaths in the lull of a battle to bored asshats pulling sophomoric pranks due to monotony.

      This film… not so much…

      • Anthony says:

        “Serenity” gets a bad rap because Whedon is a slime. However loathsome I find Whedon or his personal opinions “Serenity” is a brilliant film. It has two flaws that mar it from perfection:

        1) I have no problem with killing Wash. I have a problem with killing Wash pointlessly. If Wash died he should at least have gotten a heroic sacrifice…even shoved Zoe out of the way before getting speared.

        2) Book’s death was better, and wasn’t pointless, and he got dying lines with Mal, but we should have seen some of those events onscreen at least.

        Outside of two minor flaws it’s a perfect film.

  • Andy says:

    And Disney has already greenlighted a whole trilogy just for Rian Johnson to play with!

  • Dark Helmet says:

    “The movie LOOKS great. Ships go fast, things blow up, people shoot blasters: it looks appropriately Star Warsian. ”

    I’d rather see Space Balls Episode 2.

  • Emmett Fitz-Hume says:

    My only problem is your choice of clip. It’s the runner-up for me.
    Luke tossing the lightsaber over his shoulder was far more insulting IMHO.

    • Jon Mollison says:

      That lightsaber toss is a perfect metaphor, isn’t it?

      Luke shows Rey what he thinks of her effort the same way the filmmakers think of the old guard of Star Wars fans.

      Let me add this to the mix: Lucas only tapped into those themes because they were so much a part of the early serials that he was trying to emulate. Even his Star Wars is a copy and lacks something of the weight of the originals. They are good replications because Lucas at least had respect for what he was emulating, even if he didn’t fully understand it.

      Disney Star Wars doesn’t even have respect for Lucas’ copy. As a copy of a copy, this third generation copy has lost more even resolution than the Lucas version did.

  • William sova says:

    I will say this about the prequels as films they kinda fail but as a franchise extending to other media I believe it a success

  • Michael Erisman says:

    Rogue One was perhaps the most Star Wars of any film, true sacrifice to set up the good v. evil in EppIV. You nailed it – there was no point to this film. Ackbar, the whole fleet destroyed, and no one cares. In Rogue One you feel the losses, because they mattered.

  • Adam says:

    Well I can say if all they can do with two years is this piece of shit of a excuse of a movie is Star Wars is done and fans say fuck it stop buying disney products. I personally will never watch another Rian directed film again the man couldn’t write his way of the toilet if his life depended on it and his interview is he’s proud of this garbage he calls star wars don’t know what makes me madder him saying he’s a fan and did Star Wars justice or the giant middle finger we fans got from them with what they did to Luke.

  • Ryan says:

    Just remember, when you say “audiences want”, you mean you want. You are a snowflake. Like the rest of us.

  • Or maybe you didn’t feel the losses because you didn’t like or respect any of the cardboard cut-out characters.

  • Swami Rabbitima says:

    To be fair, Finn sacrificing himself was a damned if you do/damned if you don’t situation. If he had died in a suicide run, there’d be black folks complaining about the black character always sacrificing himself for the others.

  • TWS says:

    That was a great review of a horrible movie. How do I know it is horrible? Because you managed to ruin my already fading memories of Luke. After that clip I will never be able to look at him the same again.

    Curse you!

  • Fenris Wulf says:

    It’s hilarious and sad the way they keep bringing back Darth Vader on the flimsiest pretext, because they’re incapable of creating villains OR heroes with a tenth of Vader’s charisma.

    If I had never seen the movies and went solely on the marketing, I would assume that Darth Vader was the hero, and the original trilogy was about Vader rescuing his only son from the clutches of a fanatical death cult led by a crazy old man and a Yiddish-speaking swamp creature.

  • Amanda T says:

    This! This is both everything I’ve been saying since I saw Last Jedi and everything I couldn’t quite put into words. I had settled on Last Jedi being more of an action movie than an actual Star Wars movie, but how could I neglect to voice its nihilistic core and utter contempt of the source material?
    Thank you, good sir; thank you.

  • Skyler says:

    They remade Sucker Punch and called it Star Wars.

  • Jack Amok says:

    And ugly people. Don’t forget how ugly the people were.

  • Vlad James says:

    Fantastic review, Jasyn. Amusingly, every criticism you mentioned above can be applied to a great many recent treatments of beloved franchises, whether comics, video games, movies, television shows, etc. Social Justice is a necessary part of this cancer, but not, by itself, sufficient.

  • Geoffrey Harris says:

    There has to be a response made to this.
    What can be done effectively against these people who value trash and trash value.

  • Dude77 says:

    A very intelligent critique. Thank you.

  • Alex says:

    The Last Jedi ruined Star Wars forever. Disney’s short-term cash grab will not compare to the long-term ruin of the Star Wars brand. They did themselves in with this GARBAGE script and joke of a movie. Rian Johnson, Kathleen Kennedy, Kiri Hart and other hacks killed Star Wars with their inflated egos and feminist agenda. Done. I will never see a Disney Star Wars movie again. DONE!

  • DW says:

    So glad to discover this rare, intelligent review about a truly horrible excuse for a Star Wars movie. Sometimes I feel like I’m losing my mind these days when practically all of the critics are (incomprehensibly) universally praising this movie, and when the backlash dissent is overrun with all these weird racist, misogynist people who hate the move for all the wrong reasons.

    Your review nails the core problem with The Last Jedi – it’s a movie without heart or soul when heart and soul were so vital to what made the original Star Wars trilogy so great in the first place. Like you said, creating a sci-fi space opera story without grand heroes and villains battling for good and evil makes no sense. It’s the equivalent of making a romantic film about two people who have no chemistry and who are also not in love. The only way this would make sense would be if you were making a parody of space opera (e.g. “Space Balls”) or a cynical deconstruction of the space opera genre.

    If we were to assume for a second that Rian Johnson might have meant for The Last Jedi to be a cross between a parody and a deconstruction of Star Wars, the movie actually makes more sense. It would explain all the stupid humor that undercuts the drama and the contempt shown for the old established characters and mythology of the Star Wars universe. I have kind of half-believe this is the explanation, that Johnson deliberately set out to break the Star Wars universe on behalf of Disney so that they can bury the original movies, replace them with this new trilogy, and rewrite the mythology according to their new vision.

    I can see how a deconstructive Star Wars movie might make for an interesting side project, but to try and destroy Star Wars as we’ve known it with these new canonical movies seems crazy. The fact that Disney decided it would be a good idea to let a director shred the legacy of a story series fans have celebrated (myself included) for 40 years is crazy. (Do they hate their fans?) Maybe it’s madness born out of hubris? If they keep it up, they’ll end up killing the goose that laid the golden egg. All that money they spent on buying Star Wars will be wasted if they purge the good storytelling elements that kept fans loyal for decades and nobody cares anymore.

    But it wouldn’t be the first time something like this has happened. The same thing happened with the Alien film series. There was a similar decision to take the Aliens story in a nihilistic direction with Alien 3, which undid everything the hero accomplished in Alien 2, destroyed the good will of the fans, and effectively killed off the series for a long time. People never learn.

  • Adam Bruneau says:

    You nailed it. The movie is cowardly in every aspect. I’ve never seen a film that undercut itself at every single instance. The fact that they had to couch Luke’s flashback in three separate, complete different accounts of history shows how much faith he actually had in that vision. The film is muddled and weak and doesn’t say anything. The only reason for it’s success is social media manipulation and networking.

  • Please give us your valuable comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *