Notice: Undefined offset: 1 in /home/linweb28/c/ on line 31
Urban Fantasy/Science Fiction: Lazy Gimmick or Legitimate Genre? –

Urban Fantasy/Science Fiction: Lazy Gimmick or Legitimate Genre?

Saturday , 20, January 2018 12 Comments

Could easily double as the cover of a kinky porn film, blurb included. Also “deadwalker”, “streetwalker”, what’s the difference?!

Typing “Urban Fantasy” into Google results in 7.7 million results, dozens of Wiki articles, and a slew of book recommendations, many with covers that call to mind late 90’s schlock like Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Charmed. (I can hear the furious typing already…)  Now, I don’t pretend to have read every popular work classified as “urban fantasy”, especially since many are aimed at the housewives who consume Danielle Steele or erotica by the megabyte on Kindle.  However, my experiences thus far have made me immediately skeptical of this label.

Let’s examine Rosemary and Rue, the first installment in the October Daye series, written by Seanan McGuire, who once had a world-class British comedian disinvited from hosting the Hugo Awards for mortal fear that he might tell a fat joke.  (An accurate harbinger of things to come, considering Jon Del Arroz’s banning by Worldcon this year)  It’s about faeries and elves in the distinctly un-magical setting of contemporary San Francisco.

There are a litany of weaknesses in this book, and cataloging them all would take several times the length of this article.  However, let’s focus on the “urban” aspect; at no point does the setting add anything to the story, and at several times it actively detracts from it.  The plot switches from generic parts of San Francisco to generic magical enclaves within generic parts of San Francisco, but the two never mesh well with one another.  The magic never interacts with the urban in any interesting or unique manner.

And that leads us to the main explanation for the rise in popularity of “urban fantasy”.  Ordinarily, conjuring up a fantasy setting is a difficult task.  One has to create an entire world, consider the races, demographics, geography, political situation, culture, economy, ecology, and a thousand other details.  There is a reason Frank Herbert’s Dune is considered such an achievement.  And even an interesting setting like Martin’s Westeros is far from original, heavily borrowing from the War of the Roses.  How to deal with this challenge?  Well, for the hack writer, simply use our current society in place of the fictional fantasy world, and voila!  As an added bonus, you can claim it’s an exciting new genre with a hip name like “urban fantasy”.

A decidedly less sexy and women’s romance-laden approach to urban science fiction!

Does that mean that any works in an urban setting are automatically inferior, lazy works?  Not at all!

Just the other week, I lavished praise on Katsuhiro Otomo’s Domu, which blended cramped, 80’s Tokyo with a creepy murder mystery, and later, a tremendous battle between two telepaths.  To a large extent, his magnum opus Akira accomplished the same with a futuristic setting.  Larry Correia’s Monster Hunter series frequently combines modern weapons and situations with vampires, werewolves, orcs, elves, and many other monsters.  And I have greatly enjoyed reading John C Wright’s Moth and Cobweb series, whose first books features a Christian knight fighting ogres in modern-day America.

It’s notable which books present themselves as “urban fantasy” and which do not.  I’m a huge Haruki Murakami fan, and based on the definitions, A Wild Sheep ChaseDance Dance Dance, and several others would easily qualify.  Yet, none are marketed as being part of this genre, and I don’t see them mentioned in the many lists or recommendations online.

So what are the differences between the good and poor works, and what conclusions can be drawn about “urban fantasy” as a whole?  And why am I asking so many rhetorical questions?

For one, the urban aspects harmonize well with the fantasy in the works of Otomo, Correia, and Wright.  In Domu, there is a sense of dread and secrecy conveyed by the large, impersonal apartment complexes where new residents move in and out without any of their neighbors learning their name.  The idea that something paranormal is occurring with no one being the wiser is intriguing.  Later, the telepathy battle in the apartments is picturesque and memorable, at times looking like familiar sights we’ve all seen in apartments, and other times utterly alien, often within the same sequence.

In the Monster Hunter books, it’s neat to see monsters hiding within and attacking modern society instead of a medieval one, and being fought with guns and grenades instead of swords and shields.  It’s likely a hypothetical many of us pondered as boys.  With Wright, it’s novel seeing Athurian legend re-imagined today, as well as the unique, humorous permutations of Christian morality.  (How does one behave virtuously at Hooter’s?!)

Moreover, in all three examples above, and especially Murakami’s work, the setting is only one small aspect of the work’s appeal.  Take away the urban setting, and you still have a bunch of excellent, exciting books and comics.  There are still a bunch of neat ideas.

Too good to be considered urban fantasy?

Meanwhile, take away contemporary San Francisco from Rosemary and Rue, and what is one left with?  A predictable, tedious love triangle and a cliche fantasy world simpler and less interesting than works that had come out over two hundred years ago.  It’s window dressing for what would otherwise be a hackneyed, forgettable book.

One might also look at an example of “agrarian science fiction” in the works of Clifford Simak.  Simak loved portals into other words, aliens, immortals, and talking animals nestled in a rural village the modern world had forgotten.  But of course, the setting was of minute importance compared to the story itself.

Thus, we conclude that fantasy or science fiction set in an urban environment can absolutely work.  Not every story requires the expansive, deep world of Dune.  But be very, very wary of anything called urban fantasy…especially if it features a cover inspired by Buffy or is written by a humorless harpy calling herself an “award-winning stand-up comedian”.

  • Mr Tines says:

    Few and far between are the books that are labelled “urban fantasy” that have not also come with a whole bunch of other warning signs — the props for a romantic novel in the blurb; and elves and/or dwarves being clear signs.

    Recently there have been a number of “London fantasy” books — London is pretty much a literary genre of its own — that I have given time of day to, even if they do tend to the “pink” side : Paul Cornell’s Shadow Police series, Ben Aaronovitch’s Rivers of London books, and Tony Ballantyne’s Dream London

  • Eric says:

    For me, at least, the Rivers of London books work primarily as police procedurals, and less as “urban fantasy”; in fact, I’d like them better if the fantasy bits were removed.

  • Blume says:

    I think the problem with Urban fantasy is that the genre paranormal romance is often labeled urban fantasy in order to give the specific book so labeled an air of legitimacy. The range of modern urban fantasy is from Harry Potter to Harry Dresden. The Charlaine Harris/Kim Harrison/Anne Rice stuff is paranormal romance. But the pulp era occult detective like John Thunstone should also be labeled urban fantasy.

    • Vlad James says:

      That’s an excellent point; I hadn’t considered the specific overlap with paranormal romance, although it was clear that many “urban fantasy” works were, like much of women’s literature, romance or erotica in disguise.

  • jic says:

    The only thing “world class” about Jonathan Ross is his level of jackassery. The fact that he became a victim of people who are even worse doesn’t change that.

    • Vlad James says:

      Is that the only thing you took away from this article? Debating the merits of a comedian who wasn’t even the point of that throwaway line, but rather Seanan McGuire’s hysteria at him hosting?

      The train is fine.

      • jic says:

        “Is that the only thing you took away from this article?”

        No, it’s the only problem I had with an article I generally agreed with, and mainly reflects how strongly I dislike Jonathan Ross.

        “The train is fine.”


  • Misha Burnett says:

    The genre commonly referred to as “Urban Fantasy” does have some common characteristics, that is what makes it a genre.

    However, the fact that a story introduces fantastic elements into the modern world doesn’t make something “Urban Fantasy” any more than every story that involves spacecraft is MilSF or Space Opera.

    Ray Bradbury’s “The October Country”, Clive Barker’s “Weaveworld”, Raymond Feist’s “Faerie Tale”, Robert Heinlein’s “Magic Incorporated”–hell, the whole Weird Tales tradition of horror from Lovecraft on–all blend the fantastic and the familiar in order to tell a story.

  • Terry says:

    Whether they are urban fantasy or paranormal romances, or something else, the Kate Daniels series by Ilona Andrews is fabulous. They (husband and wife writing team) write action sequences that would make REH applaud.

  • Please give us your valuable comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *